However, he ultimately died of multisystem organ failure. Those are excerpts from statement on individual author responsibilities for Jungebluth et al Lancet Oskar Einarsson is blameworthy but not to an extent that would constitute scientistic misconduct. A guest post from Paolo Macchiarini Share this: KI announced it was … Continue reading Macchiarini blames Karolinska for losing data as he retracts paper Share this: Katarina Le Blanc also undertook the bone marrow isolation to obtain stem cells with which to coat the synthetic trachea.
I would warn serious scientist, journals as well as research intuitions to stay away from the Karolinska Institute. Continue reading Meet the filmmakers who cracked open the case against star surgeon Macchiarini. All he did was to bully whistleblowers who saved lot of possible future victims. I now received the English version of the KI report. KI said … Continue reading Karolinska requests retraction of Macchiarini paper. In addition, there is false information of ethical approval, which also constitute scientific misconduct.
Depends if the court read our submitted evidence the judge was angry at me and my lawyer for bothering her with Swedish business, which she and macchiarrini other two judges declared irrelevant. From the English translation, p. Given the fact that it has been reetraction years since the current publication, the researcher was affected by other significant consequences, and that person was not even covered by the inquiry conducted in when Paolo Macchiarini was acquitted, the Karolinska Institutet will not issue to this researcher a reprimand for research misconduct.
Those were the 6 Macchiarini papers scheduled for retraction, describing the 3 plastic trachea transplants performed at KI hospital:. Page 1 Page 2 … Page 9 Next page. Continue reading Macchiarini, 3 co-authors found guilty of misconduct in paper.
Being innocent until proven guilty is a difficult principle to hold on to when mcachiarini for action now to assuage retractio crisis are so vociferous. Justification is lacking for treatment of the patients on the grounds of so-called vital indication when a given treatment is the last resort for survivaland one misses reference to relevant animal experiments which must precede human studies that involve unproven methods.
Learn how your comment data is processed.
“The final verdict:” Lancet retracts two papers by Macchiarini – Retraction Watch
Oskar Einarsson is blameworthy but not to an extent that would constitute scientistic misconduct. Here are six papers flagged by the review board: To read more, check out our timeline.
The authors of the articles will now also be invited to give their opinions before the vice-chancellor of Karolinska Institutet reaches a decision on the matter of misconduct in research. Retractioj KI decision will appear here once it is announced, and updated with a full report I requested. KI is also calling to retract six articles co-authored by Macchiarini and his colleagues, including two highly cited papers in The Lancet.
This is very good… this definitely proofs Junglebuth does not have any ground to sue you… by the way you should consider to sue him in court indeed.
Despite the fact that KI had conducted its own … Continue reading Karolinska told a journal to retract a paper by Macchiarini. German medical ethics do not seem to cover actual patients, as I learned during a related investigation where I was macchiarino sued, but saved by the presence of media in the court roomand definitely have meaning for patients abused abroad.
Seven Researchers Guilty of Misconduct in Macchiarini Case
This clinical summary, which was completed on 29 August, then accompanied the different versions of the paper over the ensuing months. Paolo Macchiarini made a name for himself by transplanting synthetic tracheas. He was one of the drivers of the project and had detailed knowledge of the research and he is the one who subsequently received, stored and sent tissue retrcation for analysis, one of which indicated almost normal conditions. An ethical review board in Sweden is asking journals to retract six papers co-authored by f ormer star surgeon Paolo Macchiariniafter concluding that he and his co-authors committed misconduct.
Like Grinnemo he had all information about fraud and excused Macciarini in Follow Follow this blog Get every new post delivered right to your inbox. KI apparently cannot forgive them for engaging the journalists, without whom in turn there would have been no Macchiarini affair. Notify me of new posts via email. Sixty six of those citations came after the paper was subjected to an expression of concern. As KI has already made clear, a researcher may not evade investigation or be cleared of any guilt of suspected scientistic misconduct concerning research in which he or she has participated simply because he or she is a whistle blower.
Therefore, no labour law measures are wathc be taken. All of his stuff should go. In addition, there is false information of ethical approval, which also constitute scientific misconduct. All of the authors who could be reached have agreed to the retraction, including Macchiarini.
Your email address will not be published. Continue reading Meet the filmmakers who cracked open the case against star surgeon Macchiarini Share this: On 25 June, the President of Karolinska Institutet made the decision to find seven researchers responsible for scientific misconduct in research. Macchiarini first came to our attention in when he had a paper retracted for plagiarism.
KI is also calling to retract six articles co-authored by Macchiarini and his colleagues, including … Continue reading Karolinska finds Macchiarini, macfhiarini other researchers guilty of misconduct Share this: Another five authors are cleared of blame and of responsibility for scientific misconduct. Last week, allegations of research misconduct against Macchiairni Macchiarini, a professor at the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm, Sweden, were finally dismissed.
Post was not sent – check your email addresses!
Swedish review board finds misconduct by Macchiarini, calls for six retractions – Retraction Watch
Follow Follow this blog Get every new post delivered right to your inbox. Today, the journal issued a retraction notice, saying the authors wanted to retract the paper. This is the central message:. Notify me of new retractioh via email.